tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16743003.post1448254014904242905..comments2024-03-28T01:06:38.596-07:00Comments on Maya Reynolds: How To Get Published--BackwardMaya Reynoldshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12791278987339976101noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16743003.post-72124139214321893452007-06-27T05:00:00.000-07:002007-06-27T05:00:00.000-07:00Laura: I've read Boyd's article and am ambivalent...Laura: I've read Boyd's article and am ambivalent about it. I suspect she is describing "what was" more than "what is" or "what will be." While I'm not a sociologist, my understanding is that social networks are living entities, constantly changing. We can look at a snapshot in time, but the minute the photo is taken, it begins to become a part of the past. <BR/><BR/>Because the history of the two sites is very different, it's natural that their growth patterns should have been different as well.<BR/><BR/>MySpace began only three months before Facebook did, but has four times as many members as Facebook has. This is mainly due to the fact that, from its inception, MySpace was available to anyone with an email address.<BR/><BR/>Facebook began in the spring of 2004 at Harvard as a "university" networking site. For more than two years, you had to have an "edu" email address to get onto Facebook (or be invited aboard by an existing member).<BR/><BR/>However, about nine months ago, Facebook was opened up to anyone with an email address. Many of the existing members were outraged by this move. <BR/><BR/>It will be interesting to see what happens to the demographics now that both sites are available to anyone wanting an account. I expect the "exclusivity" label of Facebook will gradually diminish under an onslaught of outsiders.<BR/><BR/>Interestingly enough, when the US military banned MySpace, they did not ban Facebook. Boyd says that this is because the officers used Facebook and the enlisted noncoms used MySpace. <BR/><BR/>Since these networking sites are vital to communication with family, my guess is that the noncoms will simply shift to accounts on Facebook, further diluting the university-only feel of the site.<BR/><BR/>Americans tend to resist attempts to classify our society by "class." More importantly, commercial enterprises seeking to promote their services/wares will continue to advertise on both sites, raising the stakes.<BR/><BR/>MySpace sold to Rupert Murdoch last year. Rumors keep circulating about the potential sale of Facebook. If a large media company either buys Facebook outright or partners with them, the push will be to increase membership to increase the advertising rates. I suspect the market will win out in the end. <BR/><BR/>Thanks for raising a really interesting point, and one that is not often openly discussed.<BR/><BR/>Warm regards, <BR/><BR/>MayaMaya Reynoldshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12791278987339976101noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16743003.post-36685381618166129632007-06-27T02:18:00.000-07:002007-06-27T02:18:00.000-07:00"It's never too soon to start a blog or an account...<I>"It's never too soon to start a blog or an account on MySpace."</I><BR/><BR/>I recently read that MySpace and its competitor, Facebook have got different populations. I'd only ever seen MySpace mentioned and I'm not on either of them, but it got me curious about whether some authors might find it advantageous to market themselves in both or make a choice about using Facebook. Anyway, here's an excerpt from the article:<BR/><BR/><I>Social networking websites are increasingly splitting along class lines, according to one prominent academic.<BR/><BR/>In recent years networking sites such as MySpace and Facebook have seen remarkable growth and become some of the most popular destinations on the internet. But Danah Boyd, a researcher at the University of California and internet sociologist, said populations of different networks were now divided on a rough class basis.<BR/><BR/>Her evidence, collected through a series of interviews with US teenagers using MySpace and Facebook over the past nine months, showed there was a clear gap between the populations of each site.</I> (from <A HREF="http://technology.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,2111028,00.html" REL="nofollow">The Guardian</A>).Laura Vivancohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00906661869372622821noreply@blogger.com